Greener Closet

Analyzed Product Profile

Gina Tricot

This Analyzed Product Profile is based on 15 distinct analyzed products, a small catalogue sample. Median, range, and material mix describe those products only — not Gina Tricot as a whole.

Sample and scores

Distinct products
15
Median score
9/100
Score range
4–69
Scores 80+
0 products
Scores 50–79
4 products
Scores below 50
11 products
Complete composition
100%
Certification disclosed
0%
Analysis dates
2026-04-11 to 2026-10-13

Most common materials

Counted by distinct product, not fiber percentage. One product can appear in several rows.

MaterialProducts
Polyester12
Polyamide9
Elastane7
Wool5
Acrylic3
Cotton3

Category mix

CategoryProducts
Sweaters7
Pants6
Activewear2
Coats and Jackets1
Pajamas1
Shirts1

Highest-scoring analyzed products

How these scores are produced

Product scores on this page are produced automatically. We read the composition and certification details a retailer discloses on the product page, match each material to our research database, and apply the published clothing-score process: every product starts at 100; five material factors — microplastics, PFAS, material half-life, production energy, and fiber shedding — apply penalties weighted by how much of the garment that material makes up; a sixth factor, azo dyes, applies to the garment as a whole; and a small adjustment reflects whether any certification was disclosed. GOTS, bluesign, OEKO-TEX Standard 100, and Cradle to Cradle can also mark a product azo-dye-free. We do not lab-test garments. The Analyzed Product Profile then summarizes those product scores. It is not a corporate sustainability score, and it is not the retired LLM brand assessment.

Read the Analyzed Product Profile methodology

Are you this brand?

If a figure on this page is wrong, send a correction. We aim to respond within 24 hours. A review can temporarily hide a disputed claim; it is not an automatic permanent removal.

Request a correction for Gina Tricot

Sourced corporate evidence

These are sourced claims, not a corporate score. Missing topics are not assessed, not scored as zero.

  • Not assessed — Current quantitative performance across carbon, energy, water, labour, and animal-welfare metrics