Summary
Outdoor Voices demonstrates limited commitment to sustainability, with minimal transparency, insufficient labor practices, and a lack of comprehensive environmental initiatives. Significant improvements are needed across all categories to align with industry best practices.
Categories
10 total
Outdoor Voices does not use leather, fur, angora, or exotic animal skins but uses wool without evidence of tracing its origin.
Outdoor Voices incorporates some recycled materials but predominantly uses virgin synthetics, with only a fraction meeting its own sustainability standards.
The brand uses some Bluesign-certified fabrics but lacks major certifications like Fair Trade, B Corp, or OEKO-TEX.
The brand uses recyclable/recycled packaging but lacks evidence of initiatives to minimize textile waste.
Outdoor Voices lacks transparency in its supply chain, failing to disclose factory locations, audit results, or progress on sustainability goals.
The brand does not publish sufficient information about its labor policies, and there are reports of poor labor practices.
There is no evidence that Outdoor Voices implements water reduction initiatives or minimizes textile waste.
The brand does not publish information about its greenhouse gas emissions or steps taken to reduce carbon emissions.
Outdoor Voices is not carbon-neutral and lacks disclosed targets or data on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
There is no evidence that Outdoor Voices implements initiatives to promote product longevity or circularity.